Category: Phil Bernstein

Bad News For Portland Advertisers

I just finished Day 2 of Dan O’Day’s Copywriting Master Class. Just Dan and ten students. Two flew in from Australia, one from Canada, and one from Fiji.

Although there are lots of people writing and producing radio commercials in Oregon and Washington, I’m the only person from the Pacific Northwest at this seminar.

So if you’re a Portland-area businessperson, and you’re working with anyone other than Phil Bernstein, your media rep isn’t here. If you’re working with an ad agency, your account executive isn’t here. Neither is the agency creative director, or any of the copywriters. I guess Los Angeles was just too far to travel.

That’s the bad news.

The good news is for those people who work with Phil Bernstein. Because I’m here, and have spent 14 hours so far — with another 7 to go tomorrow learning the most effective techniques for writing and producing effective radio commercials.

Want to find out what I’ve learned, and how it can help you tell your story, find more customers, and make more sales? Call me at 503-323-6553, or email me here.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Click this link to subscribe to Portland’s Finest Advertising Blog.

Request your free copy of my white paper, The Seven Deadly Advertising Mistakes and How to Fix Them here.

Copywriting Wisdom

A short post, as I’m at Dan O’Day’s Copywriting Master Class for the next three days. Dan delivered this gem in the morning session today:

“Don’t talk to me about your grass seed — talk to me about my lawn.”

____________________________________________________________________________________

Click this link to subscribe to Portland’s Finest Advertising Blog.

Request your free copy of my white paper, The Seven Deadly Advertising Mistakes and How to Fix Them here.

Super Bowl Advertising — Another Chance For Experts to Miss the Point

Tuesday’s Wall Street Journal article on first-time Super Bowl advertisers begins this way:

Super Bowl viewers will be on the lookout for rookie mistakes — and not just on the field.

Advertising at the big game is a gamble for newcomers not just because of the rising cost of buying the ads — advertisers are paying up to $2.7 million for a 30-second spot this year, up from $2.6 million in 2007 — but also the risk to their reputations if the commercials fall flat or offend.

When the game’s over, there will be articles and polls on which were the “best” and “worst” ads. Most will judge the commercials on artistic merit, missing what should be advertising’s ultimate goal — to sell something.

One advertiser from last year’s game who kept its eye on the prize was SalesGenie, whom I wrote about a few weeks after the game. Just about all the experts hated their commercial. SalesGenie cheerfully accepted the abuse, and kept bringing truckloads of money to the bank.

Here’s another, according to the Journal:

One of last year’s newcomers, Garmin Ltd., the maker of GPS devices, is coming back this year despite coming in low on some ad poll lists with an ad featuring a map that turned into a Godzilla-inspired monster. Reaction “was a mixed bag but it was still a success,” says Ted Gartner, media relations manager at Garmin. “As long as people are spelling our name right and still purchasing the Garmin units, it’s all good.”

 

____________________________________________________________________________________

Click this link to subscribe to Portland’s Finest Advertising Blog.

Request your free copy of my white paper, The Seven Deadly Advertising Mistakes and How to Fix Them here.

 

A Price Hike Can Increase Demand

Over at Landing the Deal, Dan Tudor uses the launch of the $2,500 Tata Nano automobile as a jumping-off point in the debate over whether the lowest price always wins. Below are a couple of cases where it doesn’t:

In his book Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, Robert Cialdini writes of a jewelry store owner in Arizona who was stuck with some turquoise jewelry that wasn’t selling. She told one of her employees to cut the price, but the clerk misunderstood her and doubled the price instead.

A few days later, before they’d realized the mistake, the entire allotment of jewelry had sold out. The increased price had managed to make the jewelry more desirable to the customers who walked into the store. Cialdini explained the phenomenon this way:

You and I exist in an extraordinarily complicated environment, easily the most rapidly moving and complex that has ever existed on this planet. To deal with it, we need shortcuts. We can’t be expected to recognize and analyze all the aspects in each person, event and situation we encounter in even one day. We haven’t the time, energy or capacity for it. Instead, we must very often use our stereotypes, our rules of thumb, to classify things according to a few key features and then to respond without thinking when one or another these trigger features is present…

The customers, mostly well-to-do vacationers with little knowledge of turquoise jewelry, were using a standard principle — a stereotype — to guide their buying: “expensive = good”.

The higher price told them that this was “good” jewelry, so they bought it. Cutting the price would have steered them in the opposite direction.

Another example of this phenomenon at work appears (thank you, Chris Speer of 1190 KEX Radio) in a recent Associated Press article on a wine tasting. A research crew at California Institute of Technology discovered that a higher price tag on the bottle made the wine inside tasted better.

The lesson here is that the supply-and-demand price equation from your college economics doesn’t always take consumer psychology into account. Sometimes a price hike will help your sales.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Click this link to subscribe to Portland’s Finest Advertising Blog.

Request your free copy of my white paper, The Seven Deadly Advertising Mistakes and How to Fix Them here.

Can You Solve All Your Problems With a 30-Second Spot?

The short answer is… um… no.

A longer and more interesting answer appears on a recent episode of the public radio show This American Life. The episode is called “Shouting Across the Divide” (it originally aired in 2006) and concerns “what happens when Muslims and non-Muslims try to communicate, and misfire.”

In a segment called “America, the Ad Campaign”, the US State Department hires an ad agency to “sell American values to the Muslim world.” It doesn’t work out so well. The show runs an hour, and the segment is about 15 minutes. You can listen to the episode, or download an mp3 for free here.

The episode delves into some fairly contentious areas of racial and cultural politics. I will carefully avoid them here, and offer two observations for those who, like me, write ad copy for a living:

1. If your business has big problems, advertising won’t fix them.

2. It’s tough to sell anything — a product, service, or idea — when you don’t like or understand the people you’re marketing to.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Click this link to subscribe to Portland’s Finest Advertising Blog.

Request your free copy of my white paper, The Seven Deadly Mistakes of Advertising and How to Fix Them here.

____________________________________________________________________________________