Customer Service Done Right: Amazon

I’ve been known to use the immense power of Portland’s Finest Advertising Blog to rip companies who either can’t or don’t feel like taking care of their customers. Today I want to salute one who got it right: Amazon.com.

My wife had a  significant birthday this past weekend. As part of her gift, I ordered her the new Amazon Kindle. Although I ordered it nearly a month in advance, it was already on backorder, and they couldn’t give me a delivery date. As the birthday weekend got closer, I resigned myself to the probability that it wouldn’t arrive in time.

Until the Thursday before, when Amazon emailed me to say that the Kindle had shipped. I was delighted until I looked closer, and saw the deliver date of Tuesday, September 7. This was a problem, because:

1. As an Amazon Prime member, I was entitled to automatic two-day shipping on all orders. Two days from Thursday would have been Saturday.

2. With the birthday weekend upon me, the difference between Saturday delivery and Tuesday delivery was huge.

I called Amazon. The first person I spoke with explained that they had shipped the package via UPS ground, and since it was already en route, there was nothing she could do. So I asked for a supervisor.

This brought be to Tawny in Amazon’s “Leadership Team.” Tawny listened to my tale of woe, understood the implications right away, and put me on hold to check with UPS. When she came back, she said that she was “90 percent sure” that my package would be delivered on Saturday.

What about the other ten percent, I asked?

She said she was going to monitor the package through Friday, and that if it looked like they would miss the Saturday delivery, she’d have another Kindle sent via overnight shipping. She promised to call me with an update on Friday. I was dubious, but it seemed like my best option, so I thanked her and ended the call. My assumption was that she would forget all about it as soon as she hung up.

I was wrong.

Friday afternoon, my phone rang. Tawny was calling to say that she’d been tracking my package and didn’t trust UPS to deliver it on Saturday, so she was having it re-routed back to Amazon, and shipping out a replacement. Overnight delivery.

9:15 Saturday morning, my doorbell rang, and a driver handed me the Kindle. Problem solved, in the nick of time.

I suppose one could quibble: the argument could be made that I shouldn’t have had to ask for a supervisor. The customer service rep I initially spoke with should have been able to take care of this.

But there are plenty of places where multiple levels of management will shrug, apologize, and move on. When your group is called the “Leadership Team”, the expectations are a little higher.

Tawny’s empathy, hard work and follow-up lived up to and exceeded those expectations.  Amazon is lucky to have her.

Wanna know what else I did for my wife’s birthday? Read this.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Got a question? Wanna argue? Email Phil Bernstein here.

Sign up for Phil Bernstein’s free advertising and marketing e-newsletter here.

Become a Phil Bernstein Portland’s Advertising Expert Facebook Fan here

Why You Need to Get To The Point Fast

The issue of short attention spans is having a profound effect on those of us in the advertising business. It’s also causing professional speakers to radically change their presentations.

Andy Nulman, a speaker, comedian, and author of “Pow! Right Between the Eyes! Profiting from The Power of Surprise”, had this to say about audiences in the digital age [warning — the full post contains a considerable amount of profanity]:

The Internet has changed everything.  It has contracted attention spans to an almost ridiculously-microscopic measure, and has sung the swan song for the concept of subtlety.

For example, the old ‘speaker’s adage’ used to be:

• Tell ’em what you’re gonna tell ’em

• Tell ’em

• Tell ’em what you told ’em

These days, the audience fidgets through the preamble, tweets during the middle, and are out the door before the recap.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Got a question? Wanna argue? Email Phil Bernstein here.

Sign up for Phil Bernstein’s free advertising and marketing e-newsletter here.

Become a Phil Bernstein Portland’s Advertising Expert Facebook Fan here

Why Your Advertising Doesn’t Work Anymore

Not long ago, I met with the Marketing Director of a home improvement company in Texas. The company had been open for 20 years, and for most of that time, they’d had great success with an image campaign. Sales had been good, and people mentioned how much they liked the advertising as they filled out the paperwork.

For the past couple of years, however, response to their messages had plummeted. Showroom traffic was down, sales were down. Part of it was due to the economy, but the owners suspected that something else was going on.

I watched their “window” commercial. For 20 seconds, as pretty guitar music played, the screen showed kids in a backyard, playing in the leaves. Slowly the camera panned back to show that we were looking through a window. Eventually the store logo and address showed up, and a voice came on with a slogan — “Windows never looked so good. Life never looked so good. We’re at [location]. Don’t forget to ask about our Best Value Guarantee.”

Commercial over.

When it was over, I asked the client: “Does anyone ever ask about your Best Value Guarantee?”

Her answer: “No.”

She was mystified. Her strategy had been successful for nearly two decades. What had changed?

The answer may involve the way we now process information. The New York Times has been running a series of articles called “Your Brain on Computers”, which details the effect of information overload on our thinking process. A recent installment discussed the effect of multitasking — working with multiple screens delivering a constant stream of information.

While many people say multitasking makes them more productive, research shows otherwise. Heavy multitaskers actually have more trouble focusing and shutting out irrelevant information, scientists say, and they experience more stress.

And scientists are discovering that even after the multitasking ends, fractured thinking and lack of focus persist. In other words, this is also your brain off computers.

“The technology is rewiring our brains,” said Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute of Drug Abuse and one of the world’s leading brain scientists.

How do you generate results in the age of digitally-rewired brains?

* Get to the point immediately. Your prospects aren’t going to stick around while you “ease into it.”

* It’s not enough to make your target feel good about your brand. Offer a direct, measurable benefit that comes when they do business with you.

* Pick one action you want your prospects to take, and tell them — explicitly — to take it.

* Offer a reward to take the action, and include a deadline. Make the deadline specific. “This deal ends on September 9 at 5pm” is much more powerful than “Hurry, this offer ends soon.”

One of the best tips I’ve ever heard for getting to the point comes from Dan O’Day. It goes like this:

1. Write your script, and go through your standard editing process.

2. Delete the first sentence.

3. Does the message still work? If it does, leave the first sentence out and begin the commercial with Sentence 2.

I started doing this about three years ago. It’s amazing how often the first sentence of the script turns out to be unnecessary.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Got a question? Wanna argue? Email Phil Bernstein here.

Sign up for Phil Bernstein’s free advertising and marketing e-newsletter here.

Become a Phil Bernstein Portland’s Advertising Expert Facebook Fan here

How Much Disclaimer is Too Much?

I’m not a smoker — never have been. So when I saw this ad for Chantix, my reaction was purely academic. This is the longest, scariest disclaimer — after 17 seconds of “testimonial”, the warning language starts, and runs for more than a minute –I’ve ever seen, and my initial thought was that Pfizer was wasting its money.

I’m not disputing the need for the language — the law is the law, and if Pfizer wants to run an ad for the drug, every single word has to be there. My question was whether television is the right medium if the warning is longer than the pitch.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Clrkl1mixJw]

Two days after I saw the ad (it’s originally from 2009), I ran into a guy who had quit smoking a month before, and used Chantix to do it. He acknowledged the disclaimer, shook his head, and said, “I knew all about the side effects. But I had to quit smoking, so I was willing to take the risk.”

My sample size on this survey is currently one — one vote for “I know about the side effects, and I’m doing it anyway.” Pfizer may know what it’s doing. Feel free to check in. My only question for this exercise is its effectiveness as advertising — is the need so great, and the testimonial so powerful, that it can outweigh more than sixty seconds of warnings?

Check in below.

An Unusual Auto Dealer Offer

Tom Gill Chevrolet, a dealership in Florence, Kentucky (near Cincinnati), is offering an interesting gift-with-purchase: dinner with Pete Rose.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS1DuM88Prs&feature=player_embedded]

Be offended, or saddened, if you wish.  Pete has to make a living, and he’s not allowed to do it in baseball. The only thing I want to know is whether it works.If this promotion sells cars, I’m in favor of it.

Hat tip to Sports Illustrated for directing me to Ted Williams Head.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Got a question? Wanna argue? Email Phil Bernstein here.

Sign up for Phil Bernstein’s free advertising and marketing e-newsletter here.

Become a Phil Bernstein Portland’s Advertising Expert Facebook Fan here